LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ELCANEWS Archives


ELCANEWS Archives

ELCANEWS Archives


ELCANEWS@LISTSERV.ELCA.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ELCANEWS Home

ELCANEWS Home

ELCANEWS  April 2000

ELCANEWS April 2000

Subject:

ELCA Council Sets CCM Implementation Date, Responds to Synods

From:

News News <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Mon, 10 Apr 2000 14:36:56 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (142 lines)

Title: ELCA Council Sets CCM Implementation Date, Responds to Synods
ELCA NEWS SERVICE

April 10, 2000

ELCA COUNCIL SETS CCM IMPLEMENTATION DATE, RESPONDS TO SYNODS
00-091-JB

     CHICAGO (ELCA) -- Through a series of actions, the Church Council
of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) declared its
continued desire to move into full communion with The Episcopal Church.
It determined an implementation date for the proposed full communion
agreement, "Called to Common Mission" (CCM), and said the ELCA's 65
synods are not free to accept or reject portions of governing documents
of the church.  The council also left open the possibility for
discussions with the Episcopal Church of potential exceptions to CCM
related to ordinations, similar to an earlier statement from the ELCA
Conference of Bishops, in their March 6 pastoral letter.
     The council met here April 7-9.  It functions as the ELCA's board
of directors and serves as the legislative authority of the church
between churchwide assemblies.  The next assembly is Aug. 8-14, 2001, in
Indianapolis.
     The council adopted three separate actions related to CCM: an
implementation date, a response to a CCM-related resolution from the
Eastern North Dakota Synod and an action on constitutional issues, with
suggestions on how to bring concerns for churchwide response. All
actions were presented through the council's Legal and Constitutional
Review Committee chaired by Dale V. Sandstrom, council member, Bismarck,
N.D.   Each action was adopted overwhelmingly, but not unanimously.
     Throughout their discussions, council members expressed concern
for the unity of the ELCA and invited continuing discussion of CCM-related issues.
     In his report to the council before it discussed CCM, the Rev. H.
George Anderson, ELCA presiding bishop, acknowledged there are concerns
in the ELCA about CCM.   "My basic concern is that this council not
interfere with the action of the churchwide assembly," he said, adding
now is not the time to "abandon governing documents" of the church.
     CCM was adopted 716-317 by the 1999 ELCA Churchwide Assembly.  A
general convention of the Episcopal Church will consider CCM this July
in Denver.
     In one resolution, the council established Jan. 1, 2001, as the
implementation date for CCM.  The Episcopal Church, based on its
governing documents, plans to implement the agreement simultaneously,
assuming its general convention adopts the proposal.  Earlier
suggestions from some Lutheran opponents of the proposal called for
implementation to be delayed until after the 2001 ELCA Churchwide
Assembly, to allow time for constitutional issues to be reconsidered.
     Some opponents of CCM say they do not agree with the ELCA's
acceptance of the historic episcopate, brought to the relationship by
the Episcopal Church.  They say it violates Lutheran confessions and
threatens Lutheran identity.  The historic episcopate is a succession of
bishops back to the early Christian Church.  As part of CCM, Lutherans
would install bishops into the historic episcopate, and bishops would
perform ordinations.
     On March 25, the ELCA Eastern North Dakota Synod Assembly, which
met in Fargo,  adopted a resolution on the issue. The resolution said
the synod "supports the right of its constituent members, congregations,
pastors and bishops to freely accept or reject local implementation" of
the historic episcopate. The resolution was forwarded through the synod
council to the ELCA council for a response.
     The ELCA council's response said ecumenical commitments and
church-to-church relationships are made by the whole church and "are not
legislated on a synod-by-synod basis."
     It recognized the churchwide assembly's decision to adopt CCM and
encouraged the Episcopal Church to act favorably on the proposal.  It
called for "orderly processes of decision-making" within the ELCA and
invited "continuing prayers, study and conversation" on CCM and
expressed desire for the "greatest possible unity" within the ELCA and
with the Episcopal Church.
     The council also said if CCM is adopted by the Episcopal Church,
there will be opportunity to "examine jointly ways to practice the
commitments of full communion, exploring together a variety of matters
which include possible ways to allow a synodical bishop, in unusual
circumstances and with appropriate consultation, to authorize another
ELCA pastor to preside at an ordination."
     The council urged "that we, as sisters and brothers in Christ, in
keeping with biblical exhortation, put away falsehood and speak the
truth in love," citing Ephesians 4:25 in the Christian Bible.  The
council also expressed gratitude for the many "wholesome ways and varied
settings" in which CCM has been studied and discussed.
     The Rev. Mario C. Miranda, council member, Bayamon, Puerto Rico,
moved that the council delete the reference "to put away falsehood" and
remove the reference to Ephesians 4:25.  The motion died for lack of a
second.
     In the course of discussion, the council removed from the proposed
response a line that expressed concern "that portions of the resolution
of the Eastern North Dakota Synod exceed the authority of the synod
assembly and are contrary to the synod constitution and the churchwide
constitution."      A few council members objected to the proposed
language before it was removed.
     The Rev. Susan L. Engh, council member, Wayzata, Minn., said the
language contained "a serious charge," and she questioned whether
something could be ruled unconstitutional if it has not been
implemented. The Rev. Lowell G, Almen, ELCA secretary, said the Eastern
North Dakota Synod resolution appeared to reject constitutional
amendments adopted by the churchwide assembly, including the suggestion
that the historic episcopate could be accepted or rejected by members,
pastors, congregations and bishops.
     The Rev. Andrea F. DeGroot-Nesdahl, bishop of the ELCA South
Dakota Synod, Sioux Falls, twice encouraged the council specifically to
acknowledge the concerns of the Eastern North Dakota Synod and the
tensions and opposition that passage of CCM has raised.  DeGroot-Nesdahl
is one of nine advisory bishops to the council.
     The 2000 Eastern North Dakota Synod Assembly was the first of the
year, and many more synod assemblies will be meeting, said the Rev.
Donald H. Maier, bishop of the Northwestern Washington Synod, Seattle.
"It would be helpful to know what the mind of the council is," he said.
     In its final CCM-related action April 9, the council offered
guidance to synods that may consider resolutions similar to the Eastern
North Dakota Synod resolution.
     "While resolutions of a synod assembly seeking changes in this
church's governing documents are in order, resolutions of a synod
assembly pledging to support or undertake actions in violation of this
church's governing documents are not in order," the council said.
     The council also said there are methods available to congregations
and synods "to address their concerns and seek particular decisions."
These include resolutions from congregations to synods, resolutions from
synod councils to the church council, and memorials from synod
assemblies to the churchwide assembly, the council said.
     The resolution acknowledged that the adoption of CCM has caused
"great hope and thankfulness" throughout the ELCA, "as well as deep
concern and opposition."
     "It is appropriate for synods and congregations to express their
views to the church," said Sandstrom in presenting the proposal. "It is
not appropriate to advocate violating governing documents of the
church."
     The council included a series of footnotes with this resolution,
specifying sections of the ELCA constitution which may affect the status
of future resolutions.
     Brian D. Rude, council member, Coon Valley, Wis., said in
concluding remarks he was concerned about a few items in the council's
agenda for this meeting.
     "I'm troubled by a trend that suggests we as a church can accept
or reject governing documents of the church," he said, adding he
respects people who have differing views on the issues.
     "It is my fervent hope that we can reach compromise on CCM," Rude
said. "We need to think long and hard about the trend that we can 'pick
and choose' portions of governing documents we choose to accept or
reject."

For information contact:
John Brooks, Director (773) 380-2958 or [log in to unmask]
http://listserv.elca.org/archives/elcanews.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
October 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.ELCA.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager