LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ELCANEWS Archives


ELCANEWS Archives

ELCANEWS Archives


ELCANEWS@LISTSERV.ELCA.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ELCANEWS Home

ELCANEWS Home

ELCANEWS  April 2000

ELCANEWS April 2000

Subject:

ELCA Faculty Criticizes 'Planned Exceptions' to Full Communion

From:

News News <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Tue, 25 Apr 2000 12:00:33 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (115 lines)

Title: ELCA Faculty Criticizes 'Planned Exceptions' to Full Communion
ELCA NEWS SERVICE

April 25, 2000

ELCA FACULTY CRITICIZES 'PLANNED EXCEPTIONS' TO FULL COMMUNION
00-114-FI

     CHICAGO (ELCA) -- The faculty of Lutheran Theological Southern
Seminary, Columbia, S.C., issued a statement April 20 criticizing
suggestions of "planned exceptions" to "Called to Common Mission" (CCM),
a proposal of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) for
"full communion" with The Episcopal Church.  Southern is one of the
ELCA's eight seminaries.
     "Contrary to those who believe that 'planned exceptions' offer a
way both to uphold CCM and to preserve the unity of the ELCA, we would
hold that such a course would undermine both full communion with the
Episcopal Church and the communion we prize within the ELCA," said the
faculty members.
     CCM was adopted 716-317 by the 1999 ELCA Churchwide Assembly.  A
general convention of the Episcopal Church will consider CCM this July
in Denver.  Among other things, full communion would make it possible
for the ELCA and Episcopal Church to exchange clergy and commits them to
work together on future mission and service projects.
     Some Lutherans continue to oppose the proposal because the ELCA
would accept the historic episcopate, which is a requirement in the
Episcopal Church for the exchange of clergy.  ELCA bishops would be
installed by bishops who stand in a succession of bishops reaching back
to the earliest days of the Christian Church.  For Lutheran pastors to
enter the historic episcopate, they must be ordained by a bishop.
     "We have watched with great concern and sadness the bitter
controversy that has continued in our church," said the Southern faculty
members.  They noted that the ELCA assembly approved CCM according to
the church's constitution.  "In the midst of this controversy, we
believe that it is necessary to maintain the constitutional order of our
church," they said.
     While hoping to care for "those who are angry or uncertain about
its meaning and implications," the faculty warned against implementing
CCM in "steps which might seem to alleviate controversy in the short
run, but in the long run would damage our own communion, as well as our
communion with the Episcopal Church, in serious and lasting ways."
     One such step being discussed in the public debate would allow
Lutheran pastors to be ordained outside the historic episcopate with the
understanding they would never be involved in a clergy exchange with the
Episcopal Church.  "This would in effect allow individual ordinands
under some circumstances to decide whether or not they would be ordained
by a bishop," said the Southern faculty.
     "We can, to be sure, understand the attractiveness of such a
suggestion.  In a consumer society which exalts individual choice it
almost seems an obvious course of action.  Nevertheless, we believe that
for many different reasons this would be a destructive path for our
church to take," the statement said.
     The faculty statement offered five reasons:
 + To allow planned exceptions to CCM would call into question the right
and competence of the ELCA as a corporate body to order its ecumenical
relations in a normative way;
 + To allow planned exceptions to CCM would establish a precedent that
persons who meet a minimum doctrinal standard but will not agree to
follow the policies and practices of this church nevertheless have an
entitlement to ordination;
 + To allow planned exceptions to CCM would mean renunciation of the
goal of full communion with the Episcopal Church ... to create an
alternate path of entry into ordained ministry in the ELCA with the sole
purpose of allowing some ordinands to avoid a sign of unity with the
Episcopal Church;
 + To allow planned exceptions to CCM would not only preclude the
formation of one ministry common to the ELCA and the Episcopal Church,
it would divide the ministry within the ELCA as well; and
+ To allow planned exceptions to CCM would inevitably give the
appearance of acknowledging that the most vocal Lutheran opponents of
CCM present a credible interpretation of the agreement and its
theological implications.
     If the Episcopal Church approves CCM, the two churches will
establish a consultative commission to facilitate joint planning.  The
Southern faculty proposed that this commission develop "a brief
theological commentary on CCM."
     The faculty said the text of CCM is "already sufficiently clear,"
but it asked that the commentary "state in the plainest manner possible"
that the Christian gospel and sacraments are sufficient for the unity of
the two churches, and that the historic episcopate is not an alternative
to the gospel and sacraments but a strengthening sign of Christian
unity.
     The statement acknowledged "deep fractures which this controversy
has revealed in our own unity as a Lutheran church body.  These fault
lines were not created by CCM, and they will not go away should CCM drop
out of the picture altogether.  They would simply reemerge in some other
guise at some other difficult juncture of our life together."  It
recommended "patient theological dialogue on crucial issues of faith"
and avoiding "easy fixes."
     The faculty approved the statement at an April 14 meeting.  The
Rev. H. Frederick Reisz Jr., Southern president, said four absent
faculty members added their approval to make it unanimous.
     "This statement was unanimously approved by the Lutheran
Theological Southern Seminary Faculty: President H. Frederick Reisz,
Jr., Dean Thomas E. Ridenhour, Dr. Phillip Baker,  Dr. Agneta Enermalm,
Dr. Tony S. Everett, Dr. Lynn A. Feider, Dr. Mary B. Havens, Dr. Robert
D. Hawkins, Dr. W. Arthur Lewis, Dr. Lamontte M. Luker, Dr. Nicholas K.
Mays, Dr. Susan Wilds McArver, Dr. Brian K. Peterson, and  Dr. David S.
Yeago," it concluded.
     In April 1999 the Southern faculty issued a statement urging the
ELCA Churchwide Assembly to approve CCM.  "The reasons to approve the
document are numerous, and to our thinking, outweigh reasons for
rejection," it said.
-- -- --
     The full text of the faculty statement will be available on the
World Wide Web from the seminary's home page at http://www.ltss.edu/.

EDITORS: A copy of the text can also be obtained by writing to
President's Office, Lutheran Theological Southern Seminary, 4202 N. Main
St., Columbia, SC 29203.  The seminary's phone number is (803) 786-5150
and fax number is (803) 786-6499.

For information contact:
John Brooks, Director (773) 380-2958 or [log in to unmask]
http://listserv.elca.org/archives/elcanews.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
October 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.ELCA.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager