LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ELCANEWS Archives


ELCANEWS Archives

ELCANEWS Archives


ELCANEWS@LISTSERV.ELCA.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ELCANEWS Home

ELCANEWS Home

ELCANEWS  March 2001

ELCANEWS March 2001

Subject:

ELCA Bishops Endorse Suggested Bylaw, Guidelines Related to CCM

From:

News News <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Fri, 9 Mar 2001 10:37:06 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (113 lines)

Title: ELCA Bishops Endorse Suggested Bylaw, Guidelines Related to CCM
ELCA NEWS SERVICE

March 9, 2001

ELCA BISHOPS ENDORSE SUGGESTED BYLAW, GUIDELINES RELATED TO CCM
01-49-JB

     SAN ANTONIO (ELCA) -- The Conference of Bishops of the
Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) endorsed language for a
suggested bylaw that, if adopted, will allow for possible exceptions
to current ordination procedures in the ELCA. The bishops also
debated and suggested revisions to accompanying guidelines developed
by the ELCA Division for Ministry.
     Should the ELCA Church Council decide to transmit such a bylaw
to the ELCA Churchwide Assembly, many bishops acknowledge there is
work they must do for this exceptions proposal to be adopted.
     The Conference of Bishops is an advisory body consisting of the
ELCA's 65 synod bishops, presiding bishop and secretary.  The
conference met here March 1-6.
     The suggested bylaw and guidelines are related to "Called to
Common Mission" (CCM), a full communion agreement of the ELCA and the
Episcopal Church.  The agreement enhances opportunities for shared
ministries and projects, and, under certain circumstances, allows for
exchange of clergy in congregations.
     The proposed bylaw change and guidelines attempt to respond to
some Lutherans who remain opposed to CCM. One concern is that,
according to the agreement, a bishop must preside at all ordinations.
Before CCM, Lutheran bishops could designate another pastor to
perform an ordination, a practice which many opponents seem to
prefer.
     The bishops endorsed the language in the suggested bylaw with
little debate.  It would allow a synodical bishop "for pastoral
reasons in unusual circumstances" to designate another pastor to
preside at an ordination.  Also, the synod bishop is to consult with
the presiding bishop and seek the advice of the synod council before
making a decision, the suggested bylaw says.  Finally, the bylaw says
the synod bishop's decision shall be "informed" by guidelines adopted
by the ELCA Church Council.
     The wording suggested in the bylaw was originally proposed by
the Church Council last November, and put out for discussion in the
church.  The council is expected to discuss the possible bylaw again
at its April 6-8 meeting in Chicago, and may send it for action by
the churchwide assembly.
     The bishops devoted considerable time to debating and
suggesting carefully worded revisions in the guidelines related to
the bylaw.  By consensus, they removed recommendations that
candidates for ordination must have been given a positive entrance
decision by the synod's candidacy committee by Jan. 1, 2001, to be
eligible for a possible ordination exception; that the bylaw expire
following the 2007 ELCA Churchwide Assembly; and that the presiding
bishop "must" agree to an ordination under unusual circumstances
before it could be authorized by the synod bishop.
     The suggested revisions -- reached after frank discussions --
may address concerns expressed by both CCM supporters and critics.
Many bishops said their ultimate concern now is whether a bylaw
can achieve the required two-thirds majority for adoption at the 2001
ELCA Churchwide Assembly, assuming it is considered.
     "This will be good news to those who are concerned, will be
troubling news to those who are very much in support of CCM and will
have to deal with some searching, and probably gives both sides of
this issue some challenge to trust," said the Rev. Theodore F.
Schneider, bishop of the ELCA Metropolitan Washington, D.C. Synod, in
an interview.  Schneider presented the suggested guidelines to the
bishops on behalf of their committee that relates to the ELCA
Division for Ministry.
     Getting the necessary two-thirds majority for assembly approval
of a bylaw will be an "uphill battle," Schneider said, acknowledging
the matter is "very delicate."  The bishops want the church to "live
into the agreement," he emphasized.  Some work by the bishops will be
needed to achieve approval of a bylaw, Schneider said.
     "The worst possible outcome is for the bylaw not to be adopted,
and the church therefore have no guidelines for how it will handle
those who feel they must dissent," he concluded.
     The Rev. Stephen P. Bouman, bishop of the ELCA Metropolitan New
York Synod, called for the bishops to trust each other in dealing
responsibly with possible exceptions.
     The Rev. Peter Rogness, bishop of the ELCA Greater Milwaukee
Synod, echoed Bouman's comment, adding that the bylaw should not "be
a 'rear guard' action to undo what the church has done" in adopting
CCM.  Early in the discussions, Rogness, who was appointed to a
consultation team to discuss the exceptions issue with Episcopal
representatives, said the Episcopalians were more comfortable with
proposals that "narrowed" the number of exceptions that with those
that expanded them.
     The Rev. Stanley N. Olson, bishop of the ELCA Southwestern
Minnesota Synod, Redwood Falls, Minn., serves a synod where many
concerns about CCM have been raised.  Should a candidate for
ordination want a pastor to preside at an ordination instead of a
bishop, Olson pledged to present positive reasons why a bishop should
preside.
     "I commit to you that I will work that positive argument with
every fiber of my being," he told the bishops.
     Key provisions in the revised guidelines suggested by the
bishops call for:
     + a candidate for ordination who seeks an exception to discuss
the request with the synod bishop;
     + the synod bishop to seek the advice of the synod council and
consult with the presiding bishop;
     + the synod bishop to exercise "pastoral judgment" in making a
decision;
     + no appeal of the synod bishop's decision;
     + periodic evaluation of the guidelines by the Division for
Ministry and review by the Conference of Bishops and Church Council.
     The bishops' guideline suggestions will be returned to the
Division for Ministry for further review, said the Rev. Joseph M.
Wagner, executive director, ELCA Division for Ministry.  Eventually
the Church Council will make the decision to approve guidelines for
possible exceptions.

For information contact:
John Brooks, Director (773) 380-2958 or [log in to unmask]
http://listserv.elca.org/archives/elcanews.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
October 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.ELCA.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager