LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ELCANEWS Archives


ELCANEWS Archives

ELCANEWS Archives


ELCANEWS@LISTSERV.ELCA.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ELCANEWS Home

ELCANEWS Home

ELCANEWS  May 2004

ELCANEWS May 2004

Subject:

ELCA Council Discusses Church Governance, Consultations

From:

[log in to unmask]

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Thu, 6 May 2004 13:29:49 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (120 lines)

ELCA NEWS SERVICE

May 6, 2004

ELCA Council Discusses Church Governance, Consultations
04-090-FI

     CHICAGO (ELCA) -- The Church Council of the Evangelical
Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) heard a report on responses to
a "Questionnaire on Decision-Making" in the ELCA.  It also
advanced planning to relate council members more closely with
local expressions of the church.
     The Church Council is the ELCA's board of directors and
serves as the legislative authority of the church between
churchwide assemblies.  The council met here April 17-18.
Assemblies are held every other year; the next is Aug. 8-14,
2005, in Orlando, Fla.
     At its November 2003 meeting the ELCA Church Council asked
its executive committee to "plan and implement a period of
consultation and study on the subject of governance of the
churchwide organization."  It asked also that it see a report and
recommendations, including any proposed changes to ELCA governing
documents, no later than its November 2004 meeting.
     The council's executive committee defined a process, and the
Office of the Presiding Bishop prepared the Questionnaire on
Decision-Making in consultation with the Department for Research
and Evaluation.
     The questionnaire was mailed in February to 2,706 people --
pastors and congregation council members, synod bishops and
officers, current and former church council members, ELCA
executives, board and committee members, and presidents of ELCA
social ministry organizations, seminaries, colleges and
universities.
     At its April meeting the Church Council voted to draft a
second survey of "the same diverse field of participants" to
delve deeper into what the first survey revealed and implications
for "possible governance options."  The second survey would be
distributed around September, according to the council's action,
with a final report and recommendations from its findings brought
to the council's November meeting.
     Dr. Kenneth W. Inskeep, director, ELCA Department for
Research and Evaluation, told the council 42 percent or 1,134 of
the first survey were completed and returned.
     The questionnaire covered four areas of governance: synod
assembly, synod council, churchwide assembly and church council.
"The majority of respondents in all groups generally agreed with
the current governance structure," Inskeep said in his written
report, "however, the level of disagreement is considerably
higher among the clergy and council presidents, particularly on
items related to the representative principles."
     The ELCA's representative principles charge the church
council with establishing processes to ensure that the church's
"assemblies, councils, committees, boards and other
organizational units" are each made up of at least 60 percent lay
people, half of whom are women, and 10 percent "persons of color
and/or persons whose primary language is other than English."
     Groups that are farther removed from the churchwide
expression -- synod officers, pastors and congregational council
presidents -- and groups outside of the governance structure of
the churchwide organization -- social ministry organization,
seminary and college presidents -- were most likely to disagree
with these representative principles, Inskeep said.
     "Instead of changing the ratios, it may be necessary to
explain more clearly the rationale behind these representative
principles," Inskeep suggested.
     "Many of their comments expressed that the most qualified
persons should be allowed to be voting members, and the sentiment
that these representative principles were preventing certain
qualified persons from participating.  If the necessity for the
principles were better communicated at these levels, perhaps they
would be better understood and perceived less as obstacles to
participation," Inskeep said.
     "For all four areas of governance, the highest level of
disagreement was found for selecting voting members so that 10
percent (as a goal) are persons of color or language other than
English," Inskeep wrote.  "There was also significant
disagreement for voting conscience, as opposed to representing
the majority views of the congregation or synod.
     "Some disagreement was also found for selecting voting
members so that 50 percent are female and 50 percent are male.
Finally, many groups disagreed with the current size of the
church council," Inskeep reported.
     The church council is composed of the ELCA's four officers
-- presiding bishop, vice president, secretary and treasurer --
and 33 members, 11 elected at each churchwide assembly to serve
six-year terms.
     In response to questions seeking ways to achieve "more
involvement, trust, ownership and support" in the ELCA's decision-
making processes, "the primary opinion expressed in these
comments is the feeling of a disconnect between people in
congregations and the decisions being made at the churchwide
level," Inskeep reported.
     "Another area of potential change is the idea of voting
conscience, as opposed to representing the majority views of the
congregation or synod. Pastors and congregation council
presidents were most likely to disagree in this area, in some
cases up to 40 percent of respondents," Inskeep reported.
     "As was also clear in their comments, people at the
congregational level often do not feel represented at the higher
levels of decision-making in the church.  Perhaps if voting
members became delegates and represented the views of their
congregations at synod assemblies and the views of their synods
at churchwide assembly, people in the pews would feel more like
their voices were being heard at the higher levels of
governance," Inskeep said.
     At the April 2004 meeting, Church Council members discussed
plans for consultations and other contacts with synods in their
home areas.  The council's legal and constitutional review
committee reported that its work continues toward possible
"changes to foster greater understanding and appropriate
involvement in decision-making on the overall program of the
churchwide organization."
-- -- --
     Information on the ELCA's planning process and related
documents are available at http://www.elca.org/planning/ on the
Web.

For information contact:
John Brooks, Director (773) 380-2958 or [log in to unmask]
http://www.elca.org/news

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
October 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.ELCA.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager