LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ELCANEWS Archives


ELCANEWS Archives

ELCANEWS Archives


ELCANEWS@LISTSERV.ELCA.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ELCANEWS Home

ELCANEWS Home

ELCANEWS  November 2004

ELCANEWS November 2004

Subject:

ELCA Council Adopts Policy On Genetically Modified Organisms

From:

[log in to unmask]

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:01:20 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (95 lines)

ELCA NEWS SERVICE

November 16, 2004

ELCA Council Adopts Policy On Genetically Modified Organisms
04-214-FI

     CHICAGO (ELCA) -- The Church Council of the Evangelical
Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) adopted a social policy
resolution on genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the food
supply.  The policy directs the church's advocacy on "legislative
action, trade policies, patent laws, hunger relief and
development measures, shareholder actions and policy proposals"
to first consider several "central themes and relevant values."
     The Church Council is the ELCA's board of directors and
serves as the legislative authority of the church between
churchwide assemblies.  The council met here Nov. 11-15.
Assemblies are held every other year; the next is Aug. 8-14,
2005, in Orlando, Fla.
     The social policy resolution defined GMOs as "microbes,
plants and non-human animals that have been manipulated at the
genetic level by means of biotechnology."  It dealt primarily
with "GMOs in the human food supply since most of the current
controversy about GMOs is located there."
     "The biotechnology that makes possible genetically modified
organisms (GMOs) bears the potential both for substantial good
and permanent harm.  The manipulation of genetic material (DNA)
in seeds, for instance, has sometimes prevented crop disaster or
increased crop productivity, reduced chemical input, and lowered
production costs.  At the same time, the use of GMOs has led to
disputes about food safety, food security, food sovereignty,
economic development, trade implications and ecological
integrity," the policy said.
     "We of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America (ELCA) as
individual members and as a corporate body are called to
responsible deliberation and action when such weighty social and
ecological issues are at stake," it said.
     William R. Lloyd Jr., council member, Somerset, Pa.,
provided the sole vote against the resolution, saying it was
balanced but unclear about where the church stands on the issue.
     The purpose of the resolution is "to say what we can say
about an issue that is of great concern to a great number of
people," said Roger A. Willer, associate for studies, ELCA
Division for Church in Society.  "These are the things to
consider when dealing with this very broad and wide issue," he
said.
     David M. Nelson, council member, Bridgeport, Neb., said the
resolution stated fairly where the church stands.  It did not say
GMOs are harmful or safe; it pointed out "the unknown," he said.
     "Evidence from the physical and social sciences does not
settle the question of how harmful or beneficial GMOs are," the
resolution said.  Some compare genetic manipulation to
traditional breeding methods, while others say nothing compares
to all the possibilities of such manipulation.  Some question
whether enough testing has been done or can be done on GMOs to
ensure the safety of human health and the environment, while
others attest to the benefits of GMOs to health and the
environment.
     "In the face of this complexity, decisions on matters of
policy and practice are both difficult and necessary," the policy
said.  "Individual cases need to be evaluated with multiple
criteria for their impact on the food supply, social systems and
environment."
     To evaluate GMO-related issues, the social policy resolution
lifts central themes from two existing ELCA social statements on
economic life and caring for creation -- sufficient and
sustainable livelihood for all, stewardship and justice.  It also
lists several "relevant values" derived from ELCA social policies
-- the good of science and technology, human needs and justice,
humility and the future, and regulation and the common good.
     The resolution raises a number of questions when considering
the possible effects of GMO-related policies or actions on:
 + the alleviation of hunger at the household and community level
in a just and beneficial way.
 + the well being of the environment and human beings.
 + the participation of consumers or beneficiaries to make free
and informed decisions.
 + family farmers in the United States and abroad.
 + individual farmers and commercial enterprises to produce goods
and services.
 + protecting indigenous species in their variety (biodiversity)
and their habitat.
 + the mutual thriving of the natural and social system over the
long term, including the reversal of current environmental
degradation.
 + the health of humans who consume GMOs.
-- -- --
     The full text of the "Social Policy Resolution on
Genetically Modified Organisms in the Food Supply" will be linked
to http://www.elca.org/dcs/elca_actions.html on the ELCA Web
site.

For information contact:
John Brooks, Director (773) 380-2958 or [log in to unmask]
http://www.elca.org/news

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
October 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.ELCA.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager